Axalon,
Ok did the strace not sure what I'm looking for in it. But there is alot of
anonymous stuff in...errr wait just got an idea "changing the chfn info did
not work".
Anyway I attached the strace
Bernhard,
Changed nicks same thing?
This is strange
Eric Peters
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1 http://www.geekcode.com/
GCS d s: a- C+++ U++++ P+ L+++ E--- W++ N++ o+ K w+++
O- M-- V PS+++ PE Y PGP t++ 5+ X+++ R tv+ b++ DI++ D+
G e h++ r+ z++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
----- Original Message -----
From: Axalon Bloodstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 20, 1999 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Possible Bug ! With the BitchX RPM
> On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Eric Peters wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Getting a segfault in BitchX RPM when trying to run it as a normal
user, but su'ed it runs fine??
> >
> > Here is the output!
> >
> > [havok@ns1 havok]$ BitchX Hav{}k atlanta.ga.us.undernet.org
> > BitchX - Based on EPIC Software Labs epic ircII (1998).
> > Version (BitchX-75p3) -- Date (19990221).
> > Process [9225] connected to tty [/dev/pts/0]
> > Using terminal type [vt100]
> > Segmentation fault
>
> strace it, i can't reproduce it. thought maybe it was the {} in the nick
>
> strace -o ~/bitchx.is.broke BitchX Hav{}k atlanta.ga.us.undernet.org
> then look in ~/bitchx.is.broke
>
> > Now I'm using the same term when I try to run BitchX SU'ed And works, no
problem no errors.
> >
> > Here is the system.
> > k6-2 450
> > 128 megs
> > Standard Server Installation No werid options.
> >
> > Now here is what I have tried.
> >
> > 1. Checked Permisions- ok
> > 2. Uninstalled it and reinstalled
> > 3. Tried to Compile BitchX. Would not compile "looking into this,
thought I would throw that in heh :) "
> > 4. changed term type
> > 5. tried diffrent term "telnet, with same exact results"
> > 6.Writing this "heh"
> >
> > Any Help would be great
> > Thanx in advance,
> >
> > Eric
> >
>
> --
> MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
> --Axalon
>
bitchx.is.broke
