Going by all the issues on 8,1, I'd expect a Bugfix release 8,2 soon! I am sticking to 8,0.
Cheers, Arnab > ---------- > From: Mario Michael da Costa[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] 8.0 good :-) - 8.1 bad :-( > > <<File: message.footer.txt>> > I would just like to add that some of the users of this list live in > different time zones, so it is wishfulll thinking to expect a reply > right away. I am not sure about this but i suppose AOL is predominantly > used in the USA. that could be the reason for your prompt reply. > > and David we are all users just like you. if you post a question and we > too have had a similar problem and have solved it, only then can we > reply. and to be honest i have never seen a DVD drive yet nor the floppy > drive you mentioned. so don't expect a quick reply as soon as you post. > that too on some hardware which is not too generic. > > Thank You, > Regards, > mario > > > Carroll Grigsby wrote: > > > > "Dodd, David J" wrote: > > > > > > I have decided to go with ManDrake 8.0 instead of 8.1 because of the > > > difficultly with it recognizing my cd/dvd drive or my floppy drive > (Dell > > > Inspiron 4000). I gave in and loaded 8.0 last night and it installed > > > without a hitch. Thanks to all the experts on this subject I was > > > finally able to realize that I needed to install 8.0 and not 8.1. Its > > > funny if I had a question about installing AOL on LM I would get at > > > least 10 replies back within a half hour. I guess this subject is > just > > > to tough a topic for the expert community I will try the newbie forum. > > > > David: > > > > Since AOL requires their customized version of IE, it can't be accessed > > directly from Linux. There was a short discussion on the newbie list a > > few weeks ago about running AOL under Wine or other emulator. (Talk > > about kludges. Oh well...) If you wish to pursue this further, search > > the newbie archives for "AOL". > > > > A Google search didn't turn up much of anything other than (1) a lot of > > articles about accessing AIM from Linux, and (2) some rumors that that > > were circulating sometime in 2000 to the effect that AOL was thinking > > about granting access to Linux users. Nothing ever came of it -- I > > expect that the Time Warner crowd and their obsession with the bottom > > line had a lot to do with the decision, as in "Why spend a pile of money > > making our system accessible to a bunch of open-sourcing, > > trouble-making, anti-American hackers?" Or, perhaps a cooler head spoke > > up, pointing out that there is some animosity amongst many Linuxers > > towards the sanitized and controlled world of AOL; most of us want the > > whole internet, and the ability to access it on our own terms. We don't > > need no stinking training wheels. > > > > As to the other postings pointing out that flaming a whole news group is > > Not a Very Good Idea (TM), and that expecting an instant barrage of > > responses from a group of other users is likewise over the top, that's > > the way that it is here -- sometimes you get a great answer within a few > > minutes, sometimes you never get one. And, sometimes you get blown off. > > In this case, you pretty much got what you asked for. > > > > Lay off the caffeine. > > > > Carroll > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
