This is pathetic.  The main problem/complaint with the
original StarOffice was its size with all apps packed
into one superapp.  Very slow to start up initially
but not so bad once started.  
  Now, the whole big monolithic thing has been split
into individual apps but it really is no faster
starting now than it was when it was all packed
together.  I don't know what the ultimate value/point
of separating everything if it makes no difference in
loadup speed.  Now, it just seems that all the
component parts are slow instead of one big megapart.
  Unfortunately, I can't just use Koffice because it
doesn't handle word files very well and kchart is
still virtually useless (I need starcalc in
combination with starchart to graph/plot data and
kchart truly sucks).  Gnumeric's associated charting
app is worse than kchart.  Basically, I have only
found staroffice fully capable of handling what I need
to use it to do.  For REAL writing where I need to
cite sources, have a reference page, I use lyx because
NO other linux wordprocessor existing or in
development can handle do/citations.


I'll pay for StarOffice 6.0 if it is stable and works
as well or better than 5.2.

praedor

--- Ken Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 09 March 2002 01:32 pm, you wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:55 -0800, Deryk Barker
> wrote:
> > > Thus spake Praedor Tempus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > I would DEFINITELY go with StarOffice.  You
> cannot get
> > > > the 6 beta anymore, unless you know someone
> with it.
> > >
> > > True.
> > >
> > > It may be worht pointing out that Sun recently
> announced that when the
> > > 6.0 official release appears, they will be
> charging for it (unless
> > > you're using Solaris).
> >
> > So I'll have a look over the rim and check out
> Hancom Office (included in
> >  MDK 8.2). Anybody has some insight in this?
> >
> > wobo
> I'm using both OpenOffice 641c and StarOffice 6.0b
> and see very little 
> difference in the two. StarOffice does install JAVA
> beginning with the 6 beta 
> and openOfffice does not.
> Speed is comparable (PII 400 & Athalon 1200
> systems).....
> I'm sure there some features that are different but
> as a casual user I don't 
> see many...
> -- 
> 
> 
> Ken Thompson, North West Antique Autos
> Payette, Idaho
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.nwaa.com
> Sales and brokering of antique autos and parts.
> 
> Linux- Coming Soon To A Desktop Near You
> Registered Linux User #183936
> 
> > Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
> 
> Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to