On 11 Mar 2002 22:28:08 -0500 Michael Scottaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 18:51, Brad Felmey wrote: > > On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 14:32, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: > > > > > So I'll have a look over the rim and check out Hancom Office (included in > > > MDK 8.2). Anybody has some insight in this? > > > > My personal opinion is that exposure to HancomOffice takes a lot of the > > shine off of OpenOffice/StarOffice. It's not free and there's no source, > > but the look-n-feel is really nice, it's much faster, and the Office > > filters are hands-down better than OOo or SO. > ================================ > Funny..., my experience has been somewhat different. I have Hancom > Office 2.0 Professional. Yes it is quite fast, and most basic Word docs > opened quickly and near flawlessly. But more complicated word docs > (e.g., w/tables, fields, and other more complex formatting) HO balked or > puked where SO behaved nobly. Excel docs were even more likely to fail, > and PowerPoint files usually crashed the entire app; My PowerPoint files > (some over 10mb) opened and played w/o hitch in SO 6.0. > Mike Mike had the same problem at first. Then about 2 weeks ago I ran /usr/local/HancomOffice2/bin/hcupdater ..... the updates I got made it a lot less likely to puke on complicated files. Not Perfect yet. But dang close. James > -- > "You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it > helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, > but at the very least you need a beer." > - Frank Zappa > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
