On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:28 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2002, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:48 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Jarmo Kettunen wrote:
> > >
> > > > 4919 frames in 5.0 seconds = 983.800 FPS
> > >
> > > [root@omicron RPMS]# glxgears
> > > Loading required GL library /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.3.401
> > > 189 frames in 5.0 seconds = 37.800 FPS
> >
> > This would be interesting if you'd provide which hardware this comes
> > from.
>
> Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA 2064W [Millennium] (rev 1).
>
> The PC is an AMD K63/450.
>
> I'm actually pretty happy with this antiquated card, however. The fb
> console is accelerated and does 1280x1024 and is actually faster than
> several of the accelerated ATI R128 machines on my network. It's
> obviously not for games but does a great job otherwise.
1. As the CPUs are nearly the same the difference between the graphic
cards is obvious.
2. Concerning the 2D performance I totally agree. I'm a Matrox fan myself
and used various cards (starting with Mystique) during the last years.
It's my recommendation for non-gamers.
wobo
--
Registered Linux User 228909 Powered By Mandrake Linux 8.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft, Windows, Bugs, Lacking Features, IRQ Conflicts, System
Crashes, Non-Functional Multitasking and The Blue Screen of Death
("BSOD") are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corp., Redmond,
Washington, USA.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com