I think Jay Novak pointed out, longer rubber isn't the answer, you need to dampen it also. More movement without dampening=more issues... CR
Christopher Eveland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rubber suspension is OK if we allow longer rubbers. There are only a few It doesn't make much sense to me that after the 3" pucks got turned down, we're reposnding by looking at new engines and transmissions. My noob $0.02: A lack of gears was not a turn off when choosing to run this class as my first foray into club racing. I'm coming from autox, and for all intents and purposes we don't shift there either (put it in 2nd and go). On the other hand, cracking frames due to bumps in the track is a bit more scary. If longer pucks are going to fix it, then I'm all for them. If a _spec_ shock is the way to go, fine too , but make sure they are cheap, the $3k shock bill is why I'm leaving stock class. -Chris --------------------------------- No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. ________________________________ FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500 The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003 _________________________________ _______________________________________________ F500 mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe or change options please visit: http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500 *** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***
