Chuck, the West Racing DSR, formely the Stohr, uses "EITHER" their wetsump 
system or a drysump at the customers request.  In the West Racing IMSA Lites 
car, the homologated engine (ZX1000r) uses a wet sump.
   Do your homework.....
   
  CR

Chuck Voboril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  There is a reason for drysumps in state of the art DSR's.
The fast drivers tried to get away with deep pans and baffles and found 
through bitter experience that they couldn't.
End of story.

Beasley,Stohr, Small fortune,etc all include drysumps.

Now, that doesn't necessarily carry over to F500 with
the lower cornering forces in this class :->



Chuck





>From: "Steven Dodd" 
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: [F500] Oil pans & pumps
>Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 04:38:56 -0500
>
>No Chris, drysumps aren't necessarily evil, just EXPENSIVE. You are correct 
>sir, there are several deep pans for roadracing but that doesn't mean they 
>work. Lots of stuff sold via info-mercials proves product don't need to 
>be effective to be sold. You missed "the point" of what I was saying. Its 
>all about price and feasability. If you have to order a pan, then take 
>the bike motor to your local shop have a "roadrace" pan installed you have 
>started down an expensive path. Again, If you have to order a high volume 
>pump for your new snazzy pan or an entire dry sump system, you're then at 
>or above the cost of one our current engines. That was my point. And yes, 
>we can move on......but its easier to move with an engine that has oil.
>
>
>Chris wrote:
>Steve, others again, there are several purpose built non drysump pans out 
>there
>for motorcycle auto road racing applications.... Drysumps are not 
>nessicary
>evil.
> Can we move on???
>
>CR
>
>Steven Dodd wrote:
> Gentlemen, The oil pan debate (stock vs deep vs pressurised/accusump) is 
>a
>perfect example of the crazy path that some are venturing down. Jay just
>heralded in favor of a "deep oil pan" to keep it "cheap" . C'mon, wake up
>this is a great example of immediate departure from stock bike motors and
>thus, bigger dollars. And, to Chris R, our cars are not micro sprints. We
>turn left, right and brake. We cant just go with a deep pan and call
>everything good. Most GT cars run pressurised systems because of the danger
>of starvation. You think we pull less cornering forces than they do?
>If you don't see the dangers of this soon becoming a high dollar class READ
>your GCR . Now moncoques are allowed. Bike engines maybe next. I bet Lee
>Stohr can build you a heck of a monocoque bike motor car if you pony up the
>necessary bucks. I bet Jay would too.
>Be thankful that your current cars are faster and lighter than anything 
>else
>under 35k new. Go have some fun.
>Steven Dodd
>Texas


 
---------------------------------
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
________________________________
FormulaCar Magazine - A Proud Supporter of Formula 500
The Official Publication of Junior Formula Car Racing
Subscribe Today! www.formulacarmag.com or 519-624-2003
_________________________________



_______________________________________________
F500 mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change options please visit:
http://f500.org/mailman/listinfo/f500
*** Please, DO NOT send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list! ***

Reply via email to