Hi Unc,

Thanks for your reply. Yeah I realized it was the 6th not the 14th 
when I reread your message, and that it is the same soul incarnated 
anyway. 

Not that it is a big deal but I DO believe that this is so, because 
it makes sense from the Buddhist view, that of direct, physical  
service while enlightened (I'm sure some of the more scholarly here 
could be more precise about this...), so that even gaining freedom 
from the wheel of death and rebirth does not preclude the return of 
the dalai lama generation after generation.

Excellent mind boggling story of the lama in prison. How often I 
have struggled with my compassion under far less trying 
circumstances!

It is disturbing to see that the only two consciously prevalent  
options among many on this board regarding Maharishi are:

1. That a positive view of what he is undertaking is somehow naive 
and unevolved, or

2. That a negative view of him as deluded, criminal, thoughtless, 
unenlightened, selfish and rediculous is the only true conclusion of 
one who is being objective about the man.

I share a third opinion that fully supports all of what Maharishi 
says and does. I am not some naive sap or 'bliss-ninny' or hungry 
for a guru for my enlightenment.

My logic is very simple and straightforward:

I read the Bhagavad Gita from cover to cover two years after 
beginning TM in November 1975. Everything in it made perfect sense 
to me, especially Maharishi's discussion about a personal God vs an 
impersonal God, and that it was easier to worship the personal 
nature of God because it was concrete. Maharishi provides a good 
commentary on this also in SBAL, ~p.272.

I have always been more of a bhakti person than a gyani person. 
Granted the two go together, but I have generally followed my heart 
and feelings vs. a path of knowledge, hence worship has always come 
more naturally than study to me. 

So I prayed and did TM for awhile longer, worked for the Movement 
twice, discovering in the process that the Movement and I were like 
oil and water as far as a lifetime committment went.

Then when living in Santa Barbara, riding my bike past the lemon 
groves I began to see Guru Dev's head and shoulders appearing in my 
mind's eye (third eye I think it is called). This experience 
persisted from time to time for a few years, and I finally stopped 
noticing it.

I then found myself in Washington DC, married, with a daughter, and 
out for a jog. I began having such experiences again, this time 
approaching Guru Dev, naturally at his feet. It is a curious thing 
to approach Guru Dev because one naturally approaches his feet; that 
is where my energy and his naturally intersected. I could see the 
delicate design along the hem of his garment and his beautiful toes 
(!).

Anyway, not one to dwell on such experiences, I went on with my 
daily 'chop wood, carry water' existence. Then in April 1993 I was 
visited for four days by Guru Dev, 24 hours a day, in his presence 
constantly. At the time it was shall we say both very very natural 
and very very different. 

Just to clarify, he was actually physically present as a human body. 
I drew a picture of him at the time and looked deeply into his eyes 
and at his body. He took me into the galaxies of stars and on a walk 
in back of my house too. After four days or so, he left and the 
experience wore off.

Since that time, my spiritual perspective has changed tremendously 
as you might imagine. I clearly realize Maharishi as my spritual 
leader, though Guru Dev will always be my spiritual master. It is 
impossible for me to doubt Guru Dev and any of the events that he 
set into motion, including his preparation and delivery of Maharishi 
to the world.

So, no I don't accept Maharishi blindly as some sort of savior. My 
opinions and beliefs are built upon facts. Even Guru Dev I have 
angrily spurned on occasion, becuase that is the true way to find 
enlightenment; within ourselves.

So in conclusion I believe it is best to at worst reserve judgment 
about Maharishi, his motives and his direction.

The reason I have shared these events is to illustrate that there is 
a third opinion about Maharishi. It was not to revel in some weird 
spiritual experience or to 'prove' how enlightened I am (which is a 
pretty disgusting thought really). I have far to go in my journey. I 
was just blessed with that which I ardently sought in my heart. It 
can happen to anyone, nothing special about me.

The ability to share such events comes from those on this board. As 
fractious and freewheeling as this group is, there is a lot of light 
here, a lot of purity, dedication and knowledge. Otherwise I would 
never, ever express myself so freely.

Thanks,

Jim



--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Well, the current Dalai Lama is (I think) the Fourteenth, and I 
was 
> speaking about the Sixth, but in the traditionalist view it's the 
> same guy.  I don't necessarily believe this is true.
<snip> 
> I think that stories such as this are apt right now, as we all try 
> to make sense of the senseless and deal with the latest oddities 
of 
> Maharishi and the TM movement.  Whatever one believes about his 
> latest actions and their motivations, one can still have 
compassion 
> for the man.
> 
> Unc




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to