--- In [email protected], "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Judy: > PSSSSST: Maharishi is NOT A GURU. Never claimed to be, has made it > clear that he isn't. > > > > > Lurk: > Maharishi not a Guru? Isn't that, as they say, a bit disingenuous? > > > Judy: > Huh?? > > Lurk: > Thank you. No surprise. You actually echoed by sentiments about your > comment more concisely.
I genuinely don't understand why you think either of my comments is disingenuous. Neither do I understand, for that matter, why you're reluctant to say why you think that. Perhaps if you could say why, we could clear up the misunderstanding, but if you prefer to just call me a liar, fine, that's pretty much your problem.
