From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of authfriend Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:16 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TIME to BAN LURK
--- In HYPERLINK "mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com"FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > Almost everyone flames occasionally, because > almost everyone has buttons that get pushed > occasionally. > > And almost everyone who flames occasionally > doesn't think that they're doing it, or thinks > that they're fully justified in doing it. However, that isn't the issue. The issue is that there was a consensus here *not to flame*, no matter how justified the flame was perceived to be. But a few people have decided they shouldn't have to honor that consensus. Have to agree with Judy on this one. Not flaming was as much a collective agreement as not overposting. To be diligent about one and intentionally violate the other is inconsistent and even hypocritical. Perhaps it takes more strength to abstain from flaming than from overposting, but it’s still the same muscle. Exercise it. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.37/1042 - Release Date: 10/1/2007 6:59 PM
