--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > "but if he said it to me in church while looking > > > > at a choirgirl, my anger would be instantly full blown." > > > > > > I think the addiction here is to imagining things to get > > > angry about. Hypothetically stimulating your righteous > > > anger gland alone in your room. What does this remind me of... > > > > Now *that* is an interesting insight, Curtis. > > > > It's like "righteous anger" is the closest that > > either of them can get to "righteous," and they've > > got to continually...uh...stimulate themselves > > with imagined affronts so that they can get to > > that emotional state. > > "She has stalked me from forum to forum ever since" > is not an "imagined affront." It's a bare-faced, > vicious, knowing lie. > > Edg can speak for himself.
It is my honest, considered opinion. And you can prove that opinion wrong. You have a marvelous opportunity to do so. You have one more post and, as it turns out, *only* one more post this week in which to show what you're really about. Will you spend it writing about some- thing positive, something to do with enlightenment or meditation or spirit- ual practice or even something that inspired the heck out of you today, or will you spend it attacking me? I think the answer kinda settles things.
