The feud between Turq and Judy is a deep archetypical structure of creation. Damn, its probably in the veda someplace. Rig Veda 5th mandala, sukta 45:"Said Ghandarva Judy, 'I despise thee like a mala encrusted goat turd.' Replied, Rishi Turq, 'May you you give birth to 1000 pointy-horned rakshasas'." --- Angela Mailander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Turq, > I'm new to this forum, but I'm interested in this > fascinating feud. Are you really serious about > Never? I mean are you willing to lock yourself into > a position for all eternity on matters concerning > one Edg and one Judy? I've no real feel as to who > Judy is just yet, but Edg comes through as a genuine > personality, and so do you. Which is why I'm > talking to you. I don't talk to mindless words as a > general rule, which is not to say that anyone's > words in particular are mindless (I repeat this is > no judgment on any one's posts in particular). Now, > would either of you be willing to fill me in here > as to what the origins in the deep dark past were > that set this thing off? I see intelligent spit > fire on both sides--which is why I love this feud so > much, but I can't fathom the underlying assumptions > in the wake of all the infinitely run-away forever > implications. In other words, the discourse between > you is an excellent means of achieving > transcendental consciousness. > Please help me out. a > > TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to give Edg credit for > owning up to his > real reasons for the "loaner post" idea. It's > because he's crazy as a fuckin' loon, hopped > up on anger, and obsessed with me. > > Those are Judy's reasons, too, but she just can't > bring herself to admit it. > > What they don't seem to realize is that each > of them could post this shit 200 times a week, > and I would *still* laugh at them. I'm *never* > going to take either of them seriously. > > And with every passing word, I'm bettin' that > more people on Fairfield Life feel the same way... > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hey Rick, suppose that I'm not reposting Judy, > but instead am merely > > quoting what words of hers have impacted my mind > and that I'm now > > reacting to it by replying? Suppose I quote her > entire private email? > > > > Have I reposted her or quoted her? I challenge > you to actually come > > up with the wording for the rule that would be > Godel-bulletproof. > > > > Yeah, everyone here could intuitively know Judy > and Edg have cooked up > > this "Godel loop hole for getting around the 35 > post rule," but you, > > Rick, will have to stop anyone from quoting > anyone if you're going to > > form a rule that stops my quoting of Judy -- and > this will limit the > > freedom of dialog. > > > > I think that Godel's loop hole is perfectly > applicable here -- this is > > not merely a cleverness but a law of logic that > any rule can have a > > loop hole by this "quoting method of Godel." > > > > So I think you'll be hard pressed to sort out the > "illegal quoting" > > from the "legal quoting." In fact, Godel proved > it. > > > > Better idea: How about some of that good old > Amma love? > > > > How'zbout trusting Edg and Judy not to actually > abuse this loop hole? > > Judy has been the premier pruner here and kept > all of us on topic > > with a wickedly precise red pencil, and I do my > highjinks, but neither > > of us is trying to crash the system, cuz, well, > our hearts are as good > > as good can be donchaknow. Donchaknow? I mean, > show me one example > > of Judy flaming for flaming's sake like we've all > seen from the actual > > trolls here who are trying to pull chains and > flooding the message > > board with one word derisive replies. > > > > And who here can say that Judy isn't actually > improving Barry EVER SO > > SLOWLY? Who else loves Barry this much? > Relentlessness is a very > > pure form of spirituality. I mean, wouldn't we > all like to see Barry > > actually be able to go toe to toe on an issue > without doing his > > typical, "Oh fuck you, this conversation bores me > and you're > > wrong."???? It took me so long to figure that > out; I kept cutting him > > a break for his self-serving disappearing act. > > > > But no more. > > > > His defense of his "mild form" of predation was > the last straw for me. > > When he harmed our community progress towards > clarity by refusing to > > sort out the difference between "degree and kind" > regarding this > > issue, it was simple cowardice -- not even a > Mexican standoff. He may > > think that "cheating at Monopoly by stealing from > a another player's > > wad" is not actual "robbery," but even a child > would know that a theft > > has occurred. Just so the ever-so-common use of > the phrase "hit > > that," is considered by Barry as a "not > indicative of a predatory > > intent," but everyone who's ever had a child > knows drool when it's > > dripped. If he's unwilling to inspect the impact > of "minor sins" upon > > his life, then who will want to have a > conversation with him any more > > than one would hire an accountant who said, "Oh, > I don't care about > > exactitude -- if I get within a few bucks of it, > hey, I'm done."??? > > > > But to look you in the eye here, Rick, I'm > telling you that if Judy's > > got a big bucket of ice water to toss on another > Barry delusion and > > she's out of posts, I'll help her drench his > ingenuities. Not that > > she doesn't have the "alias" workaround or other > methods, but just > > because she's swishing a glowing sharp sword and > I'm happy give her a > > "short route" to additional posting privileges > just to see her massive > > whacks hewing the smarmy crust that Barry calls > armor. > > > > Edg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick > Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Behalf Of shempmcgurk > > > Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 2:33 PM > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] What's all this "on > loan" crap? > > > > > > > > > > > > So, Judy's been getting loaned extra posts by > Edg so that she can > > > legally go over the 35+ posts per week rule? > > > > > > I let them get away with it last week but we're > not going to keep > doing > > > that. > > > > > > What silliness! > > > > > > Why doesn't she just do what I've been doing > and post under an alias > > > ever since the rule came into effect? > > > > > > Why bother? You haven't been using up your > quota as Shemp. > > > > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: > 269.15.20/1108 - Release Date: > > 11/3/2007 > > > 9:42 PM > > > > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
