--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of jim_flanegin > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 7:19 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Was Rory Martin Bormann? > > > > PS Sal, I borrowed one of your posts for this and my previous comment. > You always have about 30 of 'em lying around anyway unused each week, > and so I appreciate in advance your spirit of generosity. In fact, > I'll make a deal with you; you continue to remind me when I've reached > my exact limit of posts-- I'm cool with that-- and I'll use a few of > your perennially unused posts if need be. OK? I'll just assume it is. > Thanks! > > No Jim. Not OK. By that logic, there would be no posting limits. Many people > post only a few a week. Should those who want to ignore the posting limit > "borrow" theirs, with their tacit "permission?" > > I hereby decree: "No borrowing, lending, selling, or otherwise transferring > unused posts." > No problem- on the other hand, using this guideline to dump on me as Sal enjoys doing is inappropriate. When she does it, she can expect a reply from me.
As others have said, the original guideline was put in place to curb flagrant over posters. I am not in that category, and have not been. If I go over a few, it isn't a big deal. I try to track the number of my posts and will continue to do so. We all recognize the Advanced Search function doesn't work.
