--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > On Jan 23, 2008, at 8:52 AM, feste37 wrote: > > > I find the idea of older men inquiring around town about the sex >life > > of a young woman disgusting. Mind your own business, Doug. > > Amen, feste. Finally, something you and I can agree on. > > Sal >
You two don't agree on Shemp's public interest note here? Om, which one of you agrees that there might be legitimate public interest in university officials having sex with students? Which one of you thinks not? Why? Just that everyone should mind their own business on this? Or just that older men should mind their own business about this and leave it to you two gals. Just wondering where you stand, -Doug in FF Shemp's law generally makes for a legitimate public welfare interest in this: "always the question of a person in an institution who is in a position of authority and whether they are taking advantage of an underling, be it a student or an employee or a potential employee or student. (spouse of any or trustee or director or co-worker) Was Hagelin in a position of authority at the time? Well, even if he wasn't, he was by virtue of being John Hagelin and this being the TMO. Was she a student? Someone posted here that she wasn't...but was she in the TMO? An employee...potential employee or student? Sorry, these things come into play."
