On Jan 24, 2008, at 9:37 PM, ruthsimplicity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> But can you guess how they did it? :-)
>
> Hint: this wasn't mere individual bias, it was a bias inherent in
the
> procedure itself--one that could be leveraged to make the change in
> metabolic rate seem deeper than it was.
You got me there. I have these visions of the subjects flexing their
muscles or stretching, but I don't have a clue.
That's another good guess. I would've guessed asanas and pranayama
(the basic rounding formula), although I certainly can't rule that out.
But it's something other than that. I ain't tellin' till someone
guesses it though--or bothers to read this paper on their own lazy ass
and can engage.
That's my ante.
