--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2008, at 8:57 PM, authfriend wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > > > What was your DSM IV guess??? > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't make DSM-IV guesses. Neither do responsible > > > > > > psychologists or psychiatrists make them about people > > > > > > they haven't at least interacted with. > > > > > > > > > > For deceased persons? > > > > > > > > > > Yes they do. > > > > > > > > And you've spoken to all these psychologist > > > > and psychiatrist friends to get their diagnosis > > > > of MMY just since Tuesday afternoon, right? > > > > > > Of course not. It was over time Dear Editor. > > > > So it *wasn't* "for a deceased person." > > > > You're getting rattled again, Vaj, as you always > > do when someone calls you on one of your more > > ludicrous pronouncements. > > LOL. Dead persons have had their life-examples used as > examples of their personality types, post-vivo, it's a > simple fact. Stop trying to distort my intention Judy.
And if contradicting himself doesn't work, the next step is double-talk. Let's recap: Responsible professionals do not diagnose people they haven't interacted with on the basis of one person's description. And any professional who thought s/he would get an accurate, objective account of MMY from Vaj is incompetent.
