--- In [email protected], "Hugo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > You'll notice that there are no busloads of butt-bouncers > > > heading off with their foam to "fly" beside the affected > > > rivers and entice them to settle down. Why? > > > > Possibly because it's not that the rivers are > > misbehaving, but rather that the rivers don't, > > um, have any choice about overflowing their > > banks when there's been a great deal of rain > > pouring more water into them than those banks > > can accommodate. > > > > Ya think? > > > > > Because that would actually be putting their > > > theory to the test, > > > > Because any effect generated by the flyers has > > to be on the rain, not the rivers, the theory is > > put to the test just as much when the flyers stay > > in Fairfield. > > Rubbish, the ME is supposed to improve weather and > stop natural disasters before they happen.
Please explain exactly how what I said is "rubbish." (Hint: You'll have to *read* it first.) Don't > forget nature is intelligent: the all seeing eye > will know if flood defences are inadequate and adjust > things accordingly (please don't think I'm bening > facetious, I've heard this and worse from TMers). > > It's the most crap thing about the TMO, (that and > the idea they bought down the Berlin wall). Funny > thing is I got an e-mail from my national office > saying we should rejoice as the USofA is now invincible. > The flood water should magically disappear now. >
