--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > <snip> > > You'll notice that there are no busloads of butt-bouncers > > heading off with their foam to "fly" beside the affected > > rivers and entice them to settle down. Why? > > Possibly because it's not that the rivers are > misbehaving, but rather that the rivers don't, > um, have any choice about overflowing their > banks when there's been a great deal of rain > pouring more water into them than those banks > can accommodate. > > Ya think? > > > Because that would actually be putting their > > theory to the test, > > Because any effect generated by the flyers has > to be on the rain, not the rivers, the theory is > put to the test just as much when the flyers stay > in Fairfield.
You are wasting your precious intellect on that fool. Have you not seen that all he wants to do is practise his TM-bashing and denouncing everything pertaing to the TMO on a daily basis ? If he did not he would go nuts probably though some would suggest he did a long time ago.
