On Jun 22, 2008, at 8:02 AM, Hugo wrote:

all off the search, I've found it. Case dismissed and,
I have to say, quite rightly so.

I should have added ayurveda to my list of things the
TMO should be testing (or rather independent people
should be testing). The thing that gets me riled the
most is the cancer curing claims made for amrit kalash.
There haven't, as far as I know, been any tests done
on humans with this stuff and yet it is routinely
prescribed in large doses to people with terminal
cancer. I have known two people who died after being
reommended the wonder gloop, both of whom had a long
slow miserable death.

We've talked about this before here Hugo. One of the disturbing things is the blank slate recommendation of Amrit Kalash in patients undergoing chemo and radiation therapy, to make them more "comfortable". The disturbing thing is that one of the primary ingredients in Amrit Kalash paste is the Indian fruit, "amla" (emblica officinalis). Amla is a fruit that has over a thousand times the free- radical scavenging activity that vitamin C has. But that's not the disturbing part. The disturbing part is that this will interfere with certain mechanisms of tumor necrosis. In other words, they potentially shunt the effectiveness of Oncological radiation therapy and certain chemotherapies whose mechanism of action is free radical damage.

Imagine having a tumor or tumors growing throughout your body then being giving treatment to destroy those specific tissues--but then because a guru authority figure (or his followers) suggest false information on an "Ayurvedic snakeoil", you unknowingly forestall your own therapy and reduce or eliminate it's real effectiveness by taking the recommended herbal preparation. What happens? You do not heal: you die a slow death.

When I make the claim that the Maharishi has blood on his hands, this is one of the reasons (above and beyond the suicides, etc.). IMO, those members of the TM org or it's zealous followers, who recommend these herbal products without proper knowledge of tumor necrosis mechanisms and the corresponding mechanisms of the herbal compounds themselves should be brought up on charges of practicing medicine without a license, at the very least.

Ruth, perhaps if your listening you could chime in on this one.


What justification is there for
this? A study showing cancer cells are destroyed in
a petri dish, what they don't mention is that bodies
behave somewhat differently and one result cannot be
infered from the other. Didn't stop the TMO though
did it? Shame it isn't illegal to refuse medical help
in favour of untested folk medicine. The fact that it's
time-tested wisdom of the vedas cuts no ice with me,
it works or it doesn't.

Judy, a serious question: Given that you're into
fighting for truth and justice and all that shouldn't
you be on Skolnicks side in this? Far from muckraking
he was making some serious points about medical
quackery that should be exposed. How much of ayurvedic
medicine has actually been double-blind tested and
independently at that?

Reply via email to