Lol. You guys are hilarious. Bevan's speech (that was repeated 4 consecutive times on Maharishi Channel) was in response to Brahmachari Nankishore's remarks, which wasn't replayed, but one of the remarks of B Nankishore was he was downplaying Maharaja Nader Rama as an (unimportant) Silent King. Did anyone else see B Nankishore's speech right before Bevan made those remarks?
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > Apropos of mainstream's comments below, if I were advising the TMO's > > grand poobah's on this matter I would recommend the following: now is > > the time to test the waters of their relationship with Girish. Since > > King Nader Raam is, well, the King, let Nader Raam command Girish to > > give up complete control of the Indian Movement to Rajah Harris and > > let's see his reaction. > > > > That's the nuclear option. I'd recommend feelers to Swami Vasudevananda, > by some native Hindu-speaker. Heck, play on Deepak CHopra's ego and privately > get HIM to work on things, maybe with Sri Sri Ravishankdar. The big issue, > regardless of who works on it, is that Varma has the bloodline, which counts > for everything in India. Many/most in India may even feel that he was always > the heir apparent, just because he was the ranking Indian and MMY's relative, > and thought the whole Tony Nader thing was a palace coup. > > Helsinki, Girish Varma may privately believe that himself. > > > Lawson > > . >
