--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <richardhughes103@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "R.G." <babajii_99@> wrote: > > > > > > > > (snip) > > > > > ...but Bevan's speech taken together with the fact that Girish' > > > > > website has nary a mention of King Tony is quite suspicious, no? > > > > > > > > > It looks pretty straight forward to me... > > > > What exactly does this Indian fellow need Bevan for? > > > > And the King? > > > > This are symbols for them of Enlish Rule, on some level, I > > believe. > > > > So, take this at face value. > > > > I'm not quite sure, why Maharishi had Bevan as a mouth piece? > > > > Anyone know, for sure, how or why Bevan got so much 'percieved' > > power? > > > > I've never been able to figure this thing out. > > > > It's like Bush being President...doesn't make any sense. > > > > > > Did any of it ever make sense? The crowns, the endless > > > backslapping speeches, why didn't they just get on and > > > teach people to meditate. Because MMY told them to do > > > all this crap, and they are just carrying on like some > > > wind-up toy that doesn't know what else to do. > > > > > > Maybe if Girish has ceceded it will snap them out of > > > their world of make-believe kings and global countries > > > and get them to do some bloody work for a change. > > > > > > But I think it's too late, there isn't the interest > > > anymore and too many other places to learn TM without > > > having to deal with the concept of Silent King Tony. > > > > > > > ...especially when you read Girish's website (the one of the > > organisation he inaugurated the other day). Why? Because it is > > pretty much going down the same failed path that Maharishi adopted > > over the past 25 years: watering down the core message of TM by > > emphasizing all the other silly programs that have nothing to do with > > TM. Indeed, when you read that Indian newspaper story that was > > linked to here originally by claudiouk, the emphasis on daily yoga > > practise almost seems more important than TM. > > > > I think Girish' ignoring of King Tony is not because he wants to > > concentrate on giving out the core message of TM but, rather, because > > he simply doesn't recognize King Tony's authority. > > > IMO, MMY's mission, vision and orgs that reflect that, have always > been about Spiritually Regnerating the World, bring lasting world > peace, bringing heaven on earth, etc. TM, SIMS, the "good ol' days" > that many of us appear wanting and long for, were never the "thing", > they were a tool. Still part of the arsenal -- but other things have > been added, and overshadowed 20min 2x -- in his vision to bring about > the above listed global changes. You may feel that he has wrong in how > his vision should best to be implemented. You are free to implement > your own vision in the way your think best. >
Putting aside the consideration of dishonesty on the part of Maharishi for a second (i.e. the departure from the up-to-the-late- seventies message of TM is 20X2/day and no change of lifestyle), how successful do you think his "new way" of spiritually generating mankind has been?
