--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/post?postID=hd0c66qqAS-
CPtr\
> 1VREnlP81oRDaRWbqDPtQeeEO2cJuZnWORp99To70J8nNhXVNGXjr_-
oLO0yPyvw9JFYhTR1\
> fVWs> , "R.G." <babajii_99@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/post?postID=CL-
yygi3hRdfSIS\
> VqCgbgbUAmywLF4JyFgi4mw-
vcT4uBklgoVNYByuwhXI2HSHdVwkdpS8sjq8rpLvbJkV3SsF\
> rHZKh2w> , "Hagen J. Holtz"
> > <hagen.j.holtz@> wrote:
> > >
> > > R.G., your thesis that Jesus would be the sound closest to God
> > seems to me like a claim directly out of mere mythology and not
> > really science-based, saying only: "You may believe it or not".
> >
> > This is not my thesis, at all...
> > My thesis is that all these mantras
> > are 'names', 'vibrations',vehicles for Transcendence.
> > I am proposing that if one was a follower of Jesus, and one would
> > like a mantra associated with him, then I was suggesting the
mantra
> > or sound:
> > 'Yeshua'
> > For example, when TM was being taught in public schools and it was
> > found to be a religion, there would be another objection, and
that is
> > that the mantras originated as 'names' or 'aspects of God'...
> >
> > So, if that objection arose, and one didn't want to start TM,
> > Because they felt they wanted a mantra associated with the God of
> > their choosing...
> >
> > Then for someone like that, you could say:
> > This is your mantra, for bringing Jesus and the qualities of him,
> > By using a vibration, which would relate to him.
> > So, if you wanted to transcend on the name or sound Yeshua,
> > Then that would be a way for someone who felt a clossness to
Jesus,
> > To find an inner sense of him, and eventually transcend, if they
were
> > taught how to use this vibration of the sound Yeshua, in the same
> > effortless way, they think any other thoughts.
> > So, in that way, TM could be said to be a Universal Technique...
> > Different from the rest,
> > Because it's not chanting, it's not dogma;
> > Rather it is a way to Transcend on a 'life-supporting sound.
> > I am making this sound Yeshua, a mantra that would relate to
Jesus,
> > From my own experience.
> >
> > There is a tradition in the Jewish religion, that is called
sitting
> > Shiva.
> > When someone passes away, the family and friends get together to
> > comfort the family, by sitting with them, and this is called:
> > Sitting Shiva.
> > Coincidence?
> > Shiva is used as a mantra for God, also,>>
>
> No Coincidence:
>
> Jehova= JaiShiva
> Joshua = Jeshiwa= JaiShiwa
> Jesus = Jeshua = JaiShiwa
>
> Adam = Allahem = Adama (the undivided) = Atma = Allah = Eli = Elija
>
> OffWorld
>
>
> > No one mantra, is 'The Mantra of God'...
> > The technique of meditation itself, is a way to get to God...
> > That is Maharishi's teaching to the world.
> > A way to transcend.
> > This is what is missing at church, or synagog, or mosque.
> > The dogma keeps people from transcending and engages the mind,
> > Instead of transcending the mind.
> > R.G.
> >
>
