--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the comments martyboi. > > You have made the assumption that all languages for describing > enlightenment are describing the same thing, even though the > descriptions sound different. This may not be the case. This becomes > more than just an interesting hobby when having to make choices > about what teachers to listen to, and correspondingly, which > practices to engage in. > > For example, take the ongoing discussion between Irmeli and > TurquoiseB on the subject of emotions. The viewpoints that each is > expressing give rise to very different ways of focusing one's > attention, and different outcomes. Each viewpoint has an > explanation for why the approach of the other will do harm in > some way. > > It's your choice to listen to one of these approaches or not. But > the outcome has real consequences.
Or, both work equally well, for people of the right temperament or predilection. And they might not work as well for people with other predilections. The game seems to be about determining what works best for you. Unc To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
