--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Most Swamis and such don't support MMY. > > > > > From the numerous swamis -- over many interviews cpnducted by Dana > > personally--- as I understand don't think very highly of MMY either. > > Are you implying some sort of bias in Dana's work? If so how? > > > > What is "the same" that might be said of MMY ? > > What you just said. > > > > > Who is it that is being supported by whom that is agreeing with > them? > > > > Again, your comment is incomprehensible to me. > > You already answered your own question. MMY has always claimed > controversial things. That the current traditionalists don't like him > is well-known and expected. It proves nothing, either way, since we > already knew that MMY was a controversial figure.
ok. But I thought your whole point in the thread starting with Shantananda was that MMY was supported by the Shankaracharian tradition. But as you acknowldege, most swamis of that tradition don't support him. And none of the shankaracharyas including the one from Kashi, support him. Except Vasad... whom none of the other sitting Shankaracharayas acknowldge. So as I sadly came to acknowledge over the past decade, MMY and the TMO do not have much, if any, support of the Shankaracharian tradition. Contrary to what we were all stronly led to believe. For me, this was part of the reason for my estrangement from the TMO. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
