--- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Most Swamis and such don't support MMY. > > > > > > > > From the numerous swamis -- over many interviews cpnducted by Dana > > > personally--- as I understand don't think very highly of MMY either. > > > Are you implying some sort of bias in Dana's work? If so how? > > > > > > What is "the same" that might be said of MMY ? > > > > What you just said. > > > > > > > > Who is it that is being supported by whom that is agreeing with > > them? > > > > > > Again, your comment is incomprehensible to me. > > > > You already answered your own question. MMY has always claimed > > controversial things. That the current traditionalists don't like him > > is well-known and expected. It proves nothing, either way, since we > > already knew that MMY was a controversial figure. > > ok. > > But I thought your whole point in the thread starting with Shantananda > was that MMY was supported by the Shankaracharian tradition. >
MMY was obviously supported by Gurudev, and was definitely supported by Swami Shantananada Saraswati. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
