I have never had a guru.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Bhairitu
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques

Llundrub wrote:

>Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
>
>
>on 6/20/05 10:05 AM, Llundrub at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>  Yes, just OM!
>
>
>So I wonder whether meditating on OM by itself might make one a recluse while meditating with a longer mantra that contains OM might not, as my friend suggested in the comment I posted here yesterday.
>
>I have a basic problem with these generalizations based on heresay. 
>
>For the basic reason that when I used to do TM at MIU I wanted to be a recluse and escape from all the cares of the world, and that was using my non-OM mantra. So I can only imagine if what Maharishi says about OM is true that I would have probably wanted to run screaming from samsara. Moreover, my desires had no support at MIU and I was miserable.  
>
>So I ask, what is the real difference? 
>
>My experience, which I consider to be the only important thing in the world, confirms for me that the mantras which I have used since TM, most of which contain OM as a part are extremely effective in very vaulable ways, and they have only bettered my life. 
>
>When I used to do Mahalakshmi Sadhana I used two main mantras which together are:
>Om shrim klim mahalakshmiyei namaha Om shrim hrim shrim kamala kamalalayei praseed praseed shrim hrim shrim om mahalakshmiyei namaha.  Many Oms, I had much benefit from doing this 250,000 times.
>

>
<snip>
If you have a "guru mantra" then the amount of repetitions required to
attain mantra siddhi are significantly reduced.  It's also interesting
to note that the "secret" mantras are often much shorter. :)






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to