--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem here is that > > TM (like scientology) assumes that the stresses are located > > physically. Thats not the same with the samskara theory. Therefore > it > > assumes that you have to release them one by one, resulting in an > > appropriate experience. > > My recollection is that more than one stress can be associated with > more than one thought/feeling/etc. More than one with more than one? This could be one to one ;-) You mean one stress could be associated/release through many thoughts, and by the very same thoughts, other different stresses could be released as well? Makes a smoke screen ;-) Well, whatever, it doesn't change the essentials of it, that is quality of stress releases = quality of thought experienced. Thats the equation, ther is no way around it. > You sort of will experience them on their way > > out. I don't know if this can be said of Samskaras, I think not. > > > > MMY came up with the theory to explain "stress release" during the > rest of TM. Some other enlightenment program may or may not involve > stress release, eh? Sorry, it was you who defined stresses as Samskaras. All indian enlightenment programs are about ridding oneself from Samskaras. Or do you mean there are stresses that are Samskaras and some that aren't? Which way, Lawson? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
