--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Tom" <azgrey@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
> <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Barry is so sunk in fantasy, so convinced that
> > > > he won't be held accountable for what he says,
> > > > that he feels perfectly free to lie about what's
> > > > in an article in the *New York Times*:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > An article in HuffPost today (originally from
> > > > > the New York Times) says that all of the talk
> > > > > about Hillary being offered the position of
> > > > > SoS in the first place was leaked to the press
> > > > > by the *Clinton* people, not from the Obama
> > > > > camp. The latter are quite distraught about
> > > > > the leaks.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://tinyurl.com/5cd3c6
> > > >
> > > -snip-
> > >
> > > i saw the same thing on cnn and msnbc - the supposed
> > > source of the SoS leak was a common story on the news,
> > > nothing confined to just the huffington post. just one
> > > of those things that comes and goes. who cares if its
> > > true or not? i personally think hc would make one
> > > hell of a good sec o' state.
> >
> > You are on the right track ed11.
> >
> > Hillary's people carefully leaked it.
>
> Wow. Now Tom's lying too.
>
> Somebody explain it to me: Why do we tolerate liars
> on this forum, again?
>
because most of us don't care? if we didn't tolerate lying, or just
making stuff up, B would have been gone long ago. as it is he is a
colorful member of the forum. what's the big deal? this isn't some
media like blog. its a place to post anything.
