In a message dated 6/24/05 12:37:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, that is not what the SC ruled. It upheld 100 years of
precedent where eminent domain is used for "public purpose" -- in this
case a redevelopment project to revitalize the econonomy of the town
/area.

Bingo! and raise taxes on more developed property!


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to