--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:22 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > MMY's translation of the Richo Akshare verse: > > > > "The verses of Veda exist in the collapse of fullness in the > > transcendental field, in which reside all the impulses of creative > > intelligence, the laws of Nature, responsible for the whole manifest > > universe. He whose awareness is not open to this field, what can the > > verses accomplish for him? Those who know this level of reality are > > established in evenness, in wholeness of life." > > > > In the context of the definition I gave (and MMY's > > translation), the verse does indeed refer to maya, > > Post hoc ergo propter hoc, no?
The question would be: is MMY's translation ad hoc? If it is accurate, than the claim that "maya" is a buddhist invention seems strained... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
