--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_re...@...> wrote: > > "Richard M" wrote: > > So Edg, are you in favour of nuclear power? And are you attracted to > > conspiracy theories? I say this because the nuclear power lobby is > > benefiting enormously from the demonization of CO2. Are the Greenies > > just pawns in a game being played by the Higher Powers to persuade the > > electorate to accept more nuclear power? (What are they called - the > > New World Order or something?) > > > Richard, > > It is my understanding that the Queen of England and her bank are > owners of virtually all the uranium of Canada, and that she's behind > the anti-C02 movement.
You mean Her Highness? http://www.stephenfry.com/ > I'll give it a 9 out of 10 possibility of > being true. That proved, then ya gots some sort of Illuminati > thingie, eh? > > I'm against nuke-power until its pollution is zero -- not merely > contained by storage systems that must eventually fail. The Greens > probably are being used. Not sure if Gore is mindful or being used. > I'm thinking Gore has a nice gig and thought for awhile it would serve > to keep his hat in the presidential ring. Dunno fer shur. > > I'm most in favor of hydrogen, but getting the cost down will only > happen if a cheap way to get it out of water is discovered. I'm not > seeing it being around the corner, but there's lots of promising > efforts out there that might "go commercial" any second. > > Other energy technologies are also emerging -- nano stuff could give > us a singularity and then, wow, what a paradigm shift -- out goes > every notion of all the big thinkers of the world about almost > everything if nanotech gives us programable microscopic bots that can > form clouds. Other singularities can do this too, so I'm just doing > my pranyama until 2012....heh heh, then, we'll see, eh? > > Edg > We'll see!
