--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_re...@...> wrote: > > "Richard M" wrote: > > So Edg, are you in favour of nuclear power? And are you attracted to > > conspiracy theories? I say this because the nuclear power lobby is > > benefiting enormously from the demonization of CO2. Are the Greenies > > just pawns in a game being played by the Higher Powers to persuade the > > electorate to accept more nuclear power? (What are they called - the > > New World Order or something?) > > > Richard, > > It is my understanding that the Queen of England and her bank are > owners of virtually all the uranium of Canada, and that she's behind > the anti-C02 movement. I'll give it a 9 out of 10 possibility of > being true. That proved, then ya gots some sort of Illuminati > thingie, eh? > That proved? What's proved? It is easy to see who owns the big publicly owned uranium mines in canada and it's not the queen of england. Her bank? What bank would that be? Do you think the queen owns the bank of england maybe?
There's no mov't, there's the climate scientists of the world investigating the effects of greenhouse gases, such as co2, on the env't and politicians finally catching up and starting to talk about it. Actually they're doing more than talk about it in the artic circle where Russia, Canada and the US have all sent naval fleets to secure drilling rights due to the massive melting of the ice sheet there. Of course I've heard that the queen is probably using large scale hair dryers to melt the ice. > I'm against nuke-power until its pollution is zero -- not merely > contained by storage systems that must eventually fail. The Greens > probably are being used. Not sure if Gore is mindful or being used. > I'm thinking Gore has a nice gig and thought for awhile it would serve > to keep his hat in the presidential ring. Dunno fer shur. > > I'm most in favor of hydrogen, but getting the cost down will only > happen if a cheap way to get it out of water is discovered. I'm not > seeing it being around the corner, but there's lots of promising > efforts out there that might "go commercial" any second. > > Other energy technologies are also emerging -- nano stuff could give > us a singularity and then, wow, what a paradigm shift -- out goes > every notion of all the big thinkers of the world about almost > everything if nanotech gives us programable microscopic bots that can > form clouds. Other singularities can do this too, so I'm just doing > my pranyama until 2012....heh heh, then, we'll see, eh? > > Edg >
