On Feb 1, 2009, at 10:22 AM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote: > Whatever you might believe, if this were any kind of formal hearing, > the charges would be thrown out immediately. No first person > account. Strictly hearsay. "Judy" never gave a first person > account. Account was only through an interview with a third party. > That person seemed to have an angle he was "working". > > I would like to see some resolution on the matter since the charges > have been leveled. Personally I always suspected that > the "book" "Judy" was to write or release would never materialize. > > That said, I have no interest in "protecting" the legacy of M. > Hardly. But it does matter to me to exercise fairness when you are > accusing someone of sexual impropieties, or at least sexual > hypocrosy.
The person's name is Linda Pearce (neé Williams), not Judy.
