--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I recall being told that MMY had once been asked
> why the Absolute had manifested, and he responded,
> "Perhaps for the sake of variety?"
> 
> On another occasion he was asked the same question.
> His answer: "It didn't."

Yes; I especially like the latter reply for its multivalence -- true 
at (at least) several "levels of consciousness" simultaneously. From 
the Witness POV ("C.C.") the Absolute has nothing to do with the 
Relative; from Brahman's POV there *is* no Absolute and no Relative :-)




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to