--- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> > 
> > I recall being told that MMY had once been asked
> > why the Absolute had manifested, and he responded,
> > "Perhaps for the sake of variety?"
> > 
> > On another occasion he was asked the same question.
> > His answer: "It didn't."
> 
> Yes; I especially like the latter reply for its multivalence -- true 
> at (at least) several "levels of consciousness" simultaneously. From 
> the Witness POV ("C.C.") the Absolute has nothing to do with the 
> Relative; from Brahman's POV there *is* no Absolute and no 
> Relative :-)

Nor any POV either, however...





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to