--- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> --- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >  
> > In a message dated 7/1/05 12:15:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > 
> > --- In  [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Had you heard  that  
> > > only 5 people now own our major media? (IS this true?)  
> > 
> > Haha, this is funny. While media concentration is a valid 
issue,  a
> > perspective that holds a meannigful possibility that "5 people"  
own
> > the media show such a total lack of knowledge about media  
ownership,
> > it would be hilarious if not so sad. 
> > 
> > Major media, TV  stations, major newspapers and magazines, key 
internet
> > sites, radio,  satelite radio, satellite and cable TV, film and 
TV
> > producers /  distributors, book publishers, music companies, etc 
are
> > virtually all owned  by large corporations, not individuals. Some
> > corporations do have  individuals with substantial power -- 
Redstone,
> > Murdoch, etc. But world  media, and/or US media ownership is 
quite a
> > bit more diverse than five  corporations and certainly is not
> > controlled by five individuals. But for  one to have such a, IMO,
> > limited "robber barron" conspiratoral perspective  of "five media
> > rulers" is telling.
> > 
> > From your rant, I almost expect  the next point to be is 
that "the
> > majority of these five people are Jews.  And we can't let this to
> > continue." While I am not linking your cooment to  such anti-
semetic
> > "directions,  the point is, bigoted and conspiracy  arguments 
often
> > have simiar "total disconnects" from reality in their  
logic/fact chain.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I hope you were not attributing the statement about 5 people  
owning
> the  
> > major media to me!
> 
> No, MD I hold you to be much wiser than that. Bizzare values
> sometimes, IMO, but you tend to adhere to facts, most of the time. 
> 
> I believe it was Rory who brought this point up about five 
individuals
> owning the media.  Not that he was adovcating this view, but said 
he
> had "heard it" and was asking if it was true. My point was that 
having
> such minimal perspective on media and business to know such claims 
are
> quite bogus, while waxing elegant and making major advocacy points 
on
> media etc, just points, IMO, to the emptiness of the larger 
perspectives.

check it out: http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/

Considering the major TV news outlets Rory was not far off. Please 
note the previously unheard of consolidation with regard to 
newspapers, radio and leisure mags also. Quite a cozy little club, 
dont'cha think?




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to