--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 7/3/05 3:10:49 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > ACTION, not combat. There IS a difference. Do you normally have this > problem mis-reading something over and over again? > > > > > As I posted earlier I am working up my list of e-mails reading and answering > them as I come to them individually. I still have several I haven't read > yet. But I understand your point and have for my past several posts. And As I > said wounded in ACTION could then be interpreted to be just about any injury > received while on a patrol in Nam. Doesn't sound very heroic to me. Seems like > there must be some additional criteria otherwise they couldn't have kept the > average soldier a full tour of duty. That is one reason why swiftees didn't > like Kerry. They felt he used every little scratch or bump to get those 3 > Purple hearts to get out of Nam as quickly as he could.
In fact, I'm sure he did and would admit to it today. In fact, the 3 hearts and you're out clause was *voluntary* not mandatory. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
