--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> > What an utter garbagedump FFL has turned into.
> >
> 
> Many in spiritual circles appear attached to the concept of non-attachment -- 
> but it appears to me (hardly a strong truth test) they are quite attached to 
> aversion.  
> 
> Just a few of today's posts I have skimmed and aversion seems to be 
> blossoming like spring -- deep (and almost trembling) aversion to americans, 
> strippers, enhanced breasts, people who are satisfied with TM, and on and on.
> 
> One thing I have found in exposure to real spiritual people (and the 
> categorization is my own, not an epistimologically pristine claim) is that 
> they are interested in everyone, everything and anything. Its like they start 
> each moment with a blank slate. Everything is new, to be explored. As a 
> friend told me once, "Maharishi could (and did) talk for 4 hours on which 
> floor tiles to choose." 
> 
> But enlightenment shalaitzament -- who cares. But a baseline of  total 
> acceptance, openness, a fresh look at everything, has some appeal to me when 
> I see it live, in action. 
> 
> TM appears not to be a universal technique to enliven such qualities in 
> everyone. Perhaps it does in some. I see people who do TM , and other 
> methods, who have these non-attached, non-adverse, enthusiastic in each 
> moment for everything. But also see a lot of people highly adverse to lots of 
> things, and perhaps attached many things similtaneously, to "my program", my 
> diet, my so pure lifestyle, my method, my guru, etc. I am not sure, but I am 
> guessing St Peter doesn't open the gate to people with a  3' stick up their 
> butts. (and man, thats gotta hurt during yogic flying). 
> 
> If I were King Tony, I would round up all the so holy rajas and obsequious 
> hangers-on and take them to the best -- and also the diviest -- strip clubs 
> in Amsterdam. Show people how to see and enjoy the bliss in everything. Even 
> in silicone breasts. 
> 
> As Louis said, "Its a wonderful world". Some long term TMers seem too bitter 
> and adverse to enjoy much of it.
>
Bravo. Good advice.

Reply via email to