--- In [email protected], "Randy Meltzer" <rm...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > > >Yes I have read Bhaja Govindam. Shankara is famous for being an advaita > >teacher but also having the ability to have the devotional aspect of bhakti. > > Just because he refers to Govinda in that treatise does not make him a > >vaishnavite. And just because Narayana is mentioned in the tradition does > >not make him one either > Have you been to Guru Dev's ashram in Allahabad? There are no Krishna/Vishnu > images there. There is however a huge shiva lingam in the middle of the > ashram. No self respecting Vaishnavite would a shiva lingam without a vishnu > or krishna statue. > And have you been to Jyotir math? No Vishnu images there either. > > The point is you know nothing of the tradition of which you claim to speak. > Everything about the shankaracharya tradition is shaivite. > > Anyone else what to chime on this other than Vaj. I am open to someone else > who is knowledgable to comment on this. Vaj thinks he knows something about > this, but I don't believe he does.
Don't get excited by the ignorance of this "Vaj" charachter. He is "all hats, no cattle". Full of hot air, just like the Turkey, the other "Buddhist" very busy posting here.
