On Jun 8, 2009, at 6:17 PM, do.rflex wrote:
--- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchy...@...>
wrote:
Zinger again! Judy, this post and your previous post for Sal was
just too easy. You would think the fish in the barrel would at
least put up a fight and make things more interesting around here
by at least offering a fact based discussion about Obama messing
with their civil liberties. Truth be told, not only do they lack
the intellectual ability for such a discussion, sadly they lack
interest as well. Pity, that. It confirms my suspicion their
allegiance to the cult of personality is more important to them
than the welfare of our country.
It was predictable and predicted. They each go bananas.
Do, Do, Do. That's the second time you used a phallic fruit reference
in a recent post. Please be more careful! You're coming awfully close
to being accused of digital rape. Please try to limit subliminal and/
or subconscious male imagery in your messages, esp. those of overtly
phallic nature.
It may be helpful for you to think of old Dick Cavett episodes with
Gloria Steinem in addition to listening to Jagged Little Pill in the
background.
Vaj
Antiquated Feminists Support Group facilitator
