--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2009, at 9:16 AM, do.rflex wrote:
> 
> > It couldn't be more obvious. RD ["Hillary is my champion"] has a BIG  
> > chip on her shoulder and it badly gives bias to her perceptions of  
> > Obama's situation and efforts.
> >
> > After all, Obama didn't stop people from picking on poor Hillary -  
> > so it's all HIS fault that she lost. That's why RD and Judy nitpicks  
> > him like the right wing fringe does.
> >
> > And in spite of the hostile, bitter attacks by the discontents,  
> > Obama's approval has consistently been in the mid 60% range since he  
> > took office.
> 
> Not to mention that Judy consistently misses the fact
> that since the "sexism" used against HC was out in the
> open, rather than hidden (all according to her) that's
> about the best situation one could hope for...(assuming,
>   of course, that there really *was* sexism, and that it
> wasn't just a figment of, um, some of her more fanatical
> followers trying to justify her loss any way they could.)
> since having something out in the open usually means it's
> a lot easier to deal with, right?  So why didn't Hillary deal
> with it?  Because either it didn't exist, or it was so negligible
> she didn't want to waste her time.
> 
> It's pretty astounding that two people who profess
> to be Democrats could wish something heinous were
> hidden rather than obvious.  But there you have it...
> 
> Sal


I don't think there's anyone on this forum who can't see that RD and Judy are 
bitterly biased against Obama because their candidate didn't win. 

Like I said, it couldn't be more obvious. And each of them goes bananas when 
it's pointed out.












Reply via email to