---
hmmmmmmmmmmmm
I will look for the good
I will look for the good
I will look for the good
Not sure if my answers to the questions were really genuinely asked for a
return reply
or if they were thrown at another poster
and just had an inferrence to me...
I would galdly respond
if
indeed
interest was there
but me thinks is bait to a fight
peace
peace
peace
I have but a few days left
(Tues)
(votes)
remember the good
and forgive the other
Mudslinging accomplishes ____________________________(?)
Can we not help each other?
It is possible.
I sure don't want everyone knowing all the less than Divine things in me
if they do come out
surely
they would not be blown up into a poster and darts given to everyone
to throw at
(?)
Let's all play nice
I am sorry for any hurt you have any of You
I know we can
have harmony
and not hatred and dissention
And I didn't even charge you $75,000
Let's start
and if harm comes to me,
ha!
I lick the wounds and look for the gift that is there
Here's some ugly out of me,(mild)
I ran over a traffic cone on purpose
so frustrated at the road construction and one way roads
driving in circles
my own ineptness at living.
There's worse.
I appreciate the kind sentiment that was blanketed in the javelins you threw at
another poster
but my comfort doesn't feel so comfy
when it was at an expense of another.
I love you all
Please lets not turn on anyone
I
n
[email protected], Duveyoung <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> Once again we see Bluey challenging the community here to pony up some sort
> of response on an issue about which he's taken a stance.
>
> But what good the question if the questioner is a coward who has historically
> been unable to have a discussion here because -- his intellectual abilities
> being merely middlin'-- he gets in over his head on any philosophical topic,
> panics, and then begins abusing folks as he haughtily struts around singing a
> hymn to himself while tying off and shooting up his drug of choice:
> obfuscation?
>
> Many a poster here has thrown down a hefty challenge to him, and he simply
> has always run from the topic once his lack of intellect begins to be
> obvious.
>
> The next time a newbie shows up here, really now, shouldn't we in all love
> and fairness warn that person about Bluey the Odious Clod? Why do we allow a
> new heart to walk into this clear and present danger without our shouting
> "heads up" in unison?
>
> Are we in league with this troll that we watch him set someone up by being
> initially charming? Don't we know that eventually he will spring his trap
> and thumb his nose at someone who never saw it coming?
>
> That newbie will then be, in our public view, ashamed for having been "taken
> in like a Three Card Monte sucker" by BlueBarry's mask of friendliness only
> to find that only a fool would think BlueBarry has ever had a friend in his
> whole life. That's what we, as a community, do to newbies -- we watch our
> trolls stalk and eventually attack them. This is wrong. This is wrong of us.
>
> Case in point: Meow. Here's a person with a heart that sings sweet astral
> flowers into every ear at Rick Party and who's openly ping-ponging with
> BlueBerry right now. Don't we all know it is only a matter of time before he
> viciously smacks her for being, well, being anything that his vermin mind
> blurts out that satisfies his addiction to snarking?
>
> It is a given that he will in no way coddle Meow or honor her spirit if she
> "fucks up according to Emperor BlueBarry's New Bible." We all know how this
> will go down, and all it takes from Meow will be posting anything on a day
> that finds BlueBarry's hate-tank needing to be topped off.
>
> Meow's like this hippie chick putting a flower into the muzzle of a Kent
> State guardsman and expecting that soldier to never pull the trigger. That's
> how innocent Meow is and how vile Barry will eventually be to her.
>
> Hopefully, he'll put her into a special status and never do this to her just
> to prove me wrong. That would be great.
>
> Meow, gotta ask, have you seen him in action here enough that you get it that
> BlueBarry is FFL's equivalent of the last bear that Timothy Treadwell had
> lunch with?
>
> Meow, do you believe in God? If so, look out.
>
> Meow, did you vote for Hillary? If so, look out.
>
> Meow, do you think spiritual evolution is possible? If so look out.
>
> Meow, do you practice TM? If so, look out.
>
> Meow, do you think it's generally ill advised for a man to target much
> younger women for sex with zero intent to have a relationship that steps up
> to the May-December challenges? If so, look out.
>
> Meow, do you think that it would be unlikely that someone can levitate and
> become invisible in front of large crowds repeatedly and yet there are no
> headlines, no reports, no scientific inquiry about such siddhis? If so, look
> out.
>
> Meow, do you think you've got a lock on certain truths? If so, look out.
>
> Now, what will Barry's response be to this post?
>
> If I really lay into him, generally he ignores it and stops posting about the
> topic for a while, or he'll say something like, "Look at Edg sucking up to a
> newbie." Or, he'll use my name in another post on another thread in such a
> way as to refer to this post obliquely with a snark about "Edg the suck-up"
> or whatever.
>
> If Barry were a real man, he'd stand up and face his detractors here about
> his conduct and its impact on the scholarly nature of our group's intent to
> discover nuggets in scripture, feel the hearts of others as we share
> resonance, and delight in the variety of POVs here -- you know, those things
> that make Barry puke.
>
> MANY posters here deride Barry consistently for the above personality flaws,
> and his willful intent to maraud our party is the proof that Barry is but a
> rat in a sleeping infant's crib.
>
> And, yes, I do believe that Maharishi's siddhi program had about a 95% Venn
> overlap with Patanjali's description of the siddhis and how samyama is
> practiced.
>
> Edg
>
