A perfect response . . . sigh. . . . .
--- In [email protected], "meowthirteen" <meowthirt...@...> wrote: > > --- > hmmmmmmmmmmmm > > > I will look for the good > > I will look for the good > > I will look for the good > > > > Not sure if my answers to the questions were really genuinely asked for a > return reply > > or if they were thrown at another poster > and just had an inferrence to me... > > I would galdly respond > if > indeed > interest was there > but me thinks is bait to a fight > > > peace > peace > peace > > > I have but a few days left > (Tues) > (votes) > > remember the good > and forgive the other > > Mudslinging accomplishes ____________________________(?) > > > Can we not help each other? > > It is possible. > > I sure don't want everyone knowing all the less than Divine things in me > if they do come out > surely > they would not be blown up into a poster and darts given to everyone > to throw at > (?) > > Let's all play nice > > I am sorry for any hurt you have any of You > > I know we can > have harmony > and not hatred and dissention > > And I didn't even charge you $75,000 > > Let's start > and if harm comes to me, > ha! > I lick the wounds and look for the gift that is there > > Here's some ugly out of me,(mild) > I ran over a traffic cone on purpose > so frustrated at the road construction and one way roads > driving in circles > my own ineptness at living. > > There's worse. > > I appreciate the kind sentiment that was blanketed in the javelins you threw > at another poster > but my comfort doesn't feel so comfy > when it was at an expense of another. > > I love you all > > Please lets not turn on anyone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I > n > [email protected], Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Once again we see Bluey challenging the community here to pony up some sort > > of response on an issue about which he's taken a stance. > > > > But what good the question if the questioner is a coward who has > > historically been unable to have a discussion here because -- his > > intellectual abilities being merely middlin'-- he gets in over his head on > > any philosophical topic, panics, and then begins abusing folks as he > > haughtily struts around singing a hymn to himself while tying off and > > shooting up his drug of choice: obfuscation? > > > > Many a poster here has thrown down a hefty challenge to him, and he simply > > has always run from the topic once his lack of intellect begins to be > > obvious. > > > > The next time a newbie shows up here, really now, shouldn't we in all love > > and fairness warn that person about Bluey the Odious Clod? Why do we allow > > a new heart to walk into this clear and present danger without our shouting > > "heads up" in unison? > > > > Are we in league with this troll that we watch him set someone up by being > > initially charming? Don't we know that eventually he will spring his trap > > and thumb his nose at someone who never saw it coming? > > > > That newbie will then be, in our public view, ashamed for having been > > "taken in like a Three Card Monte sucker" by BlueBarry's mask of > > friendliness only to find that only a fool would think BlueBarry has ever > > had a friend in his whole life. That's what we, as a community, do to > > newbies -- we watch our trolls stalk and eventually attack them. This is > > wrong. This is wrong of us. > > > > Case in point: Meow. Here's a person with a heart that sings sweet astral > > flowers into every ear at Rick Party and who's openly ping-ponging with > > BlueBerry right now. Don't we all know it is only a matter of time before > > he viciously smacks her for being, well, being anything that his vermin > > mind blurts out that satisfies his addiction to snarking? > > > > It is a given that he will in no way coddle Meow or honor her spirit if she > > "fucks up according to Emperor BlueBarry's New Bible." We all know how > > this will go down, and all it takes from Meow will be posting anything on a > > day that finds BlueBarry's hate-tank needing to be topped off. > > > > Meow's like this hippie chick putting a flower into the muzzle of a Kent > > State guardsman and expecting that soldier to never pull the trigger. > > That's how innocent Meow is and how vile Barry will eventually be to her. > > > > Hopefully, he'll put her into a special status and never do this to her > > just to prove me wrong. That would be great. > > > > Meow, gotta ask, have you seen him in action here enough that you get it > > that BlueBarry is FFL's equivalent of the last bear that Timothy Treadwell > > had lunch with? > > > > Meow, do you believe in God? If so, look out. > > > > Meow, did you vote for Hillary? If so, look out. > > > > Meow, do you think spiritual evolution is possible? If so look out. > > > > Meow, do you practice TM? If so, look out. > > > > Meow, do you think it's generally ill advised for a man to target much > > younger women for sex with zero intent to have a relationship that steps up > > to the May-December challenges? If so, look out. > > > > Meow, do you think that it would be unlikely that someone can levitate and > > become invisible in front of large crowds repeatedly and yet there are no > > headlines, no reports, no scientific inquiry about such siddhis? If so, > > look out. > > > > Meow, do you think you've got a lock on certain truths? If so, look out. > > > > Now, what will Barry's response be to this post? > > > > If I really lay into him, generally he ignores it and stops posting about > > the topic for a while, or he'll say something like, "Look at Edg sucking up > > to a newbie." Or, he'll use my name in another post on another thread in > > such a way as to refer to this post obliquely with a snark about "Edg the > > suck-up" or whatever. > > > > If Barry were a real man, he'd stand up and face his detractors here about > > his conduct and its impact on the scholarly nature of our group's intent to > > discover nuggets in scripture, feel the hearts of others as we share > > resonance, and delight in the variety of POVs here -- you know, those > > things that make Barry puke. > > > > MANY posters here deride Barry consistently for the above personality > > flaws, and his willful intent to maraud our party is the proof that Barry > > is but a rat in a sleeping infant's crib. > > > > And, yes, I do believe that Maharishi's siddhi program had about a 95% Venn > > overlap with Patanjali's description of the siddhis and how samyama is > > practiced. > > > > Edg > > >
