--- In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And of course, now that you've defined "sane" I agree with 
> you. It's the old story of people trying to make a relative 
> perspective absolute. Putting the earth at the center of the 
> solar system and then concocting bizarre theories to explain 
> the movements of the planets. 

Excellent analogy.  In my experience, fundamentalism 
is inextricably tied to self-importance.  The greater
the need to be important, the greater the desire for
a spiritual trip that will tell you you're important,
and at the center of the universe.  And the greater
the spiritual myth that the group IS important, the
*more* fundamentalist its beliefs become over time.

> And I think the points you've outlined reveal a sadistic 
> streak in those who aggrandize their egos by believing 
> that they alone have the truth. They get some kind of sick
> pleasure by envisioning everyone else being subjected to 
> eternal torture.

Self-aggrandizing, self-reinforcing self-importance again.
In general in the spiritual smorgasbord, the stronger the
myth of how "special" the "chosen" are, the worse the
fate that awaits the "non-chosen" is.

> They would probably enjoy administering it themselves if 
> they had the chance. 

And they have.  One need look no further than the Inquisition
to see True Believers conferring upon themselves the role of
torturers in Hell.

> Extreme fundamentalists do just that, by blowing up innocent 
> people (as George Bush does) or refusing to pardon those 
> condemned to death (as he did in record numbers as Governor 
> of Texas).

Or blowing up innocent civilians in London, all in the 
name of God.  I really DO believe that the bottom line
of fundamentalism, in *whatever* incarnation it presents
itself, is self-importance.  The more that a religious
or spiritual group tells its followers that they are
"special" or "chosen," the more likely that group's
dogma will be fixed and rigid and presented as undeniable,
obvious "truth."  When it comes to which is the cart and
which is the horse, I honestly think that self-importance
and the desire for it is the horse, and fundamentalism
is the cart following along behind.  Not vice-versa.

Unc







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to