--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > --- In [email protected], akasha_108 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > OF COURSE Rove had clearance for such information. ANyone > working > > > to > > > > > advise the president of the USA in aformal capacity has TC > > > clearance. > > > > > It's not that hard to get. > > > > > > > > Again, are you are stating that Rove had official CIA clearance > to > > > > know who were covert CIA operatives worlrd wide? Hard to > believe a > > > > campaign manager (Rove's postion in 2003) would be given such > > > > clearance. Can you provide cites that Rove had such clearance? > No > > > > armchair platitude please. > > > > > > You don't have to "know who were covert CIA operatives world > wide" to > > > be cleared to know who a specific operative is. > > > > > > Yes. And if you read really carefully you will see it says, had ... > > clearance TO KNOW ... Quite different than what you appeared to > read > > in your apparent rush. > > > > Again, if you can state with authority and provide evidence that the > > CIA formally cleared Rove to have access to information of the IDs > of > > covert CIA opperative, then Rove meets one criteria for prosecution. > > Another would be that Plame was actually a covert op, that per > > authors of the statute say she was not. Several other reqs apply, > but > > lets deal with these first. > > Sigh, the Pres can clear whomever he wants to know whatever he wants > them to know. > > And the CIA would know betterthan the drafters of a regulation > whether or not a specific person was "undercover" according to THEIR > definitions. Unless the bill defines "undercover" in an unusual way, > the agency would be the one to consult on that matter, not the > lawmakers.
Whats your point? So did the CIA say she is covert per the statute? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
