--- In [email protected], "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Glad you wrote b/c I've gotta tell you that the recent FF Ledger > > > > article was a real shame. You're just like a TM-exer. You should > > > > know that you've succeeded in alienating a good friend. Nothing > > > > more to say. > > > > > > Friend? > > > > > > "If I had to choose between betraying my country and > > > betraying my friend, I hope I would have the guts to > > > betray my country." - E. M. Forster > > > > > > Countries, cults...same difference. > > > > > > I thought you told the truth. *That* is what your > > > "friend" is upset about. *That* is the taboo you > > > broke. Good for you. > > > > > > Unc >> > > > > Are you stupid? Please point to where Rick used reasoning and logic > > to reveal truth? It is a small picture, based on small and > > prejudiced thinking. Rick is strongly prejudiced. There is no > > question about that. His posts are irrational gossip when it comes > > to making up stuff about Maharishi. > > Rick has reported his direct interaction with Maharishi and the > testimony of others that both he and Maharishi had contact with. > You're making some large jumps with loaded words. From 'strongly > prejudiced' to 'irrational gossip' to making 'stuff up'. Where's the > logic in that? Some of the things that he reports are contrary to the > image that Maharishi and the TMO project. What make's you think that > he's making stuff up? > > > JohnY >>>
I am talking about his unsubstantiated gossip about Maharishi having sex with disciples. Stupid slander with no basis. Not that I care if Maharishi did, but why make things up when Maharishi claims he is a celebate monk. I believe Maharishi because of his 'power' he emanates, which, by the way, Rick has said many times ...."Maharishi has very powerful Shakti" The article with Rick in it was engineered by Rick probably, over time. Was it Rick? What was your role? Are you friends with the reporter ? How did it evolve from months back when you mentioned the reporter that gets his ideas from FFL, and is talking ot you (the moderator) about an article? In other words how did your inherent prejudice drive this article? NOTE: I don't care about the article by the way, we are talking only about processes, which would be interesting to study. OffWorld. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
