--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunsh...@...> wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2010, at 6:54 PM, authfriend wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "PaliGap" <compost1uk@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], merudanda <no_reply@> wrote: > >> > >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0Qu7a2lbkw > > > > 'scuse my ignorance, but who was that speaking? > > I'm sticking my head above the parapet here - but I > > thought he did a fine job. > > > And was that substantial chap reading his magazine > > and making notes Bevan? (And why wasn't he paying > > attention!) > > Richard, you can't be serious. > Hagelin just mouthed the same banal, > boring platitudes he always does, and in the > same creepy sing-songy pseudo-feminine > voice...not to mention > that he looks more than ever like the Pillsbury Dough Boy. > Bevan looks even more overweight and > sedentary than he ever has. I wonder how > much energy it takes to get him off that chair? > The whole thing was ghastly. I thought I'd take > a look and see if there were any changes of > note lately--I'm sorry I did. Few things are more > depressing than these aging Vedic queens. > > Sal
Oh! As you can see I'm not up on this stuff (Hagelin, who he?). Each to his own etc etc. I thought he came across quite natural and sincere. A minority of one here for sure. Bevan (for it was He) - now his body language looked downright rude and disrespectful. Flicking through his copy of, what? "Train Spotter Monthly"? - and seeming to me to pointedly disregard proceedings. Perhaps my radar needs a service.
