Another EPIC FAIL by authfiend. She coulda just called him a "poopy-pants" up front and got it over with, possibly saving 49 more posts.
--- In [email protected], "authfiend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > > > Yep this all reads well like some lot of FFL > > > pharisaical sophistry. > > > > You don't understand the meaning of the terms you are > > using. You have successfully conveyed a vaguely > > pejorative intention and used some Jesusy sounding > > words. I'm surprised you didn't drop in a thus or thou > > to complete the illusion that you were speaking to us > > from an old book. > > Curtis demonstrates in his response that he is > practiced in the use of pharasaical sophistry. > > <snip personality disordered pointlessly antagonistic rant> First, note she is not even a party to the conversation. I guess she is, once again, just itching to start another fight. Second, note her comment to Sal earlier in the posting week. Judy wrote: "Hey, Sal, don't you think you should apologize to Lurk for having falsely accused him of lying about some posts you made (and falsely denied making) before you go after him again?" Hey Judy, don't you think you should apologize to Curtis for having twice posted YOU WISHED HE WAS DEAD before you go antagonizing him again? At least OffKilter and Shemp had the good sense to unsubscribe after making complete fools of themselves. But ooooooooooh nooooooo!!! Judy has to be all "I'm invincible. It's only a flesh wound." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eMkth8FWno
