--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > <snip> > > Remember what this is about: your interest in > > portraying me as just as extreme in my positive view > > of MMY as you are in your negative view. And you're > > having to do some very elaborate stretches in the > > attempt. > > We will have to agree to disagree here. If you see > Maharishi's role as an instrument of nature reviving > the knowledge like Jesus or Buddha then you are at > least as positive about him as I am "negative"
You come to this conclusion, IMHO, via a big bag of debating tricks designed to distort and distract attention from a very straightforward comparison. Anyone can see the comparison is valid simply by reading what you and I say we think of Maharishi. I played along with your tactics for probably longer than I should have, but at this point I'll just trust the good sense of anybody who happens to be reading the exchange to see through the obfuscation. (Or not, as the case may be.)
