The quote below doesn't come from either of these
two URLs. It's silly to deny it. Anyone can go check
for themselves.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" <willytex@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> authfriend:
> > No, they aren't (as I just said).
> > 
> THIS ONE IS FROM MARKET-TICKER:
> 
> 'You've GOT To Be Kidding Me' 
> http://market-ticker.org/post=185094
> 
> THIS ONE IS FROM THE CORNER:
> 
> 'PDF Layers in Obama's Birth Certificate'
> http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/265767/pdf-layers-obamas-birth-certificate-nathan-goulding
> 
> But, you already knew that!
> 
> "I've scanned a lot of images. What you scan is
> what you see. What I haven't seen when I've scanned
> something is where they show letters cut off such
> as what looks like a "5" on the left hand side
> where it bends down.
> 
> Also, the dashed green lines on the background go
> straight across, and the black lines of the form
> curve down. It they scanned the black lines only,
> then why transpose onto green lined paper, why not
> just show the scanned document on whatever was the
> original paper as I always do when I scan a document.
> This doesn't pass the smell test.
> 
> Either this is a forgery on green paper, or they
> are hiding something on that left side that was
> cropped off. Why can't we just get a scanned copy
> of the original birth certificate, showing every
> notation on margins, every smudge, everything?
> 
> Frankly, until today I was thinking this birther
> thing was much ado about nothing, but after seeing
> this document I now have many suspicions about
> Obama's birth..."
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/3kz7clp
> 
> > > > Interesting that what Willytex quotes 
> > > > isn't from either of the Web pages he 
> > > > gives URLs for...
> > > >
> > > The quotes are from:
> > > 
> > > 'You've GOT To Be Kidding Me!'
> > > http://market-ticker.org/post=185094
> > > 
> > > and
> > > 
> > > 'The Corner'
> > > http://tinyurl.com/3kz7clp
> > > 
> > > > > That this document has been cropped and altered by
> > > > > an idiot who thought he knew how to scan a 
> > > > > birth certificate using Adobe Acrobat?
> > > > > 
> > > > > At the least this was a scanned document produced 
> > > > > by a moron who thought he knew PhotoShop.
> > > > > 
> > > > > You've GOT To Be Kidding Me!
> > > > > http://market-ticker.org/post=185094 
> > > > > 
> > > > > "I've scanned a lot of images. What you scan is 
> > > > > what you see. What I haven't seen when I've scanned 
> > > > > something is where they show letters cut off such 
> > > > > as what looks like a "5" on the left hand side 
> > > > > where it bends down. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Also, the dashed green lines on the background go 
> > > > > straight across, and the black lines of the form 
> > > > > curve down. It they scanned the black lines only, 
> > > > > then why transpose onto green lined paper, why not 
> > > > > just show the scanned document on whatever was the 
> > > > > original paper as I always do when I scan a document. 
> > > > > This doesn't pass the smell test. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Either this is a forgery on green paper, or they 
> > > > > are hiding something on that left side that was 
> > > > > cropped off. Why can't we just get a scanned copy 
> > > > > of the original birth certificate, showing every 
> > > > > notation on margins, every smudge, everything? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Frankly, until today I was thinking this birther 
> > > > > thing was much ado about nothing, but after seeing 
> > > > > this document I now have many suspicions about 
> > > > > Obama's birth..."
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://tinyurl.com/3kz7clp
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to